With the exception of a few rare complaints, people generally didn't care that Apple just neutered all Safari ad blockers, a situation that contrasts with what happened to Google in 2019, and the wave of criticism it received. It had fewer rules to apply than before.Īpple was never criticized for doing what Google didn't even doĪt the time, extension developers, including most ad blockers, migrated their code and didn't say a peep. On the other side, when Apple rolled out the new Content Blocker API, it enforced a maximum limit of 50,000 rules for each new extension that wanted to block content inside Safari. The company was immediatelly attacked for trying to "kill ad blockers," and after months of criticism, Google eventually backed down on its initial plan and settled on a higher limit ranging from 90,000 to 120,000, a number that many extension developers, and especially those managing ad blockers, still consider insufficient. Google wanted to limit the maximum rules an extension could pass to Chrome to 30,000, which many Chrome extension developers said was extremely low, and wouldn't even begin to accommodate the likes of ad blockers, parental control or traffic inspection extensions. Instead, the extension will deploy a set of "content blocking rules" and the browser will do the blocking without the extension seeing any user data. They will limit how extensions intercept and block web requests by preventing the extension from interacting with the web request directly. In a very simple explanation, the changes that Apple implemented in Safari and the upcoming changes planned for Chrome have taken the same path to the same goal, but with different code and terminology.īoth Chrome and Safari will use a new extensions backend. The other alternative was that users switch to using one of the new Content Blocker-based ad blockers however, he described the new Content Blocker system as being "extremley limited in adblocking functions." In a post on GitHub, the extension's developer recommended that users who care about running an ad blocker either switch to using Firefox for Mac, where ad blockers still work just fine, or remain on an older Safari version, which is not really an option. The latest to fall is uBlock Origin for Safari, another ad blocker, which shut down for good two weeks ago. ![]() Other apps also followed in September 2018, when Apple's new rules were set in stone with iOS 12's release. AdBlock published a blog post where it said its re-written Safari ad blocker was running faster than before, but also listed a long list of downsides. A few days later, it was followed by antivirus maker Malwarebytes, which shut down its VPN extension. ![]() Ad blocker AdGuard shut down its Safari extension in July last year.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |